What Public Schools Are Doing to Support Mental Health in 2025

Measuring Student Success in Public Schools: Beyond Test Scores

As public schools navigate shifting educational landscapes in 2025, it is imperative to reassess how we measure student success. Traditional reliance on standardized test scores provides only a narrow lens on student achievement. For parents, students, and educators alike, recognizing broader indicators of success in public schools offers a more complete and equitable view of school performance and student growth.

Why We Must Move Beyond Test Scores

Standardized tests historically served as the dominant metric for student and school performance. However, research shows several limitations:

• Test scores often fail to capture growth, engagement, and other non-academic dimensions of success.

• They correlate strongly with external factors such as socioeconomic status and family background rather than purely reflecting school quality.

• Recent commentary suggests test-based assessments may even derail student engagement and learning if overemphasized. hechingerreport.org

Thus, measuring student success in public schools demands a more holistic, multi-dimensional approach. The goal is not to eliminate test scores entirely but to integrate them into a broader framework of indicators.

Key Dimensions of Student Success in Public Schools

Below is a summary table of dimensions that public schools should consider when measuring student success:

Transfer Pathways: Moving from One Public School District to Another

When a student moves from one public school district to another—or when a family wishes to transition their child to a non-resident district—the concept of transfer pathways becomes critical. Whether prompted by a relocation, school fit concerns, academic programs or safety issues, navigating the process of moving between public school districts in 2025 requires preparation, awareness of state/district rules, and proactive communication. This article outlines key considerations, steps, eligibility factors and expert commentary to help parents, students and educators make informed decisions about district-to-district transfers.

Why Families Choose to Use Transfer Pathways

Families may pursue transferring a student between public school districts for several reasons:

• Relocation to a new address outside the student’s current district boundary.

• Seeking a better academic program, extracurricular offering or specialized service that the resident district may not offer.

• Safety, health or hardship issues that make the current school environment less appropriate.

• Opportunity for open-enrollment or inter-district choice policies in certain states.

Understanding the motivation early helps frame which type of transfer pathway is relevant—whether an intra-district move, inter-district “choice” transfer or a residency-related enrollment change.

Terminology: Intra- vs. Inter-District Transfers

It is useful to distinguish between common terms:

• Intra-district transfer: The student remains within their home

Public schools play an essential role in supporting students from low-income households — especially those eligible for free or reduced-price lunch (FRPL). This article outlines how public schools support students on free/reduced-price lunch programs, examines key strategies in 2025, and presents insights for parents, educators, and policymakers.

Understanding the Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Program

The federal National School Lunch Program (NSLP) offers free or reduced-price meals to eligible students. Eligibility is determined based on family income: children from households at or below 130 % of the federal poverty level qualify for free meals, and those between 130 %–185 % for reduced-price meals.

Statistics from recent data:

• More than 95,000 schools serve lunches to approximately 29.7 million students daily.

• Schools where a large share of students qualify for FRPL are more likely to offer additional nutrition-related programs.Economic Research Service

Thus, being eligible for free or reduced-price lunch signals significant need — and schools aim to respond with structured support.

Key Support Strategies in Public Schools

Public schools use a range of strategies to support students eligible for free/reduced-price lunch programs:

1. Ensuring Access to Nutritious Meals

By providing free or reduced-price lunches — and in some cases breakfasts — schools help reduce food insecurity and nutrition shortfalls. Research shows students participating in school meals:

• Are less likely to experience food insecurity.

Introduction

Many parents assume that enrolling a child in a public school means there are no significant costs beyond the minimum. However, the reality is that even in tuition-free public schools, there are substantial hidden costs associated with fees, supplies and extras. As we approach 2025, inflation, technology demands and expanded extracurricular activities are raising the stakes for families. This article outlines the major categories of hidden costs in public schools, provides up-to-date figures and offers strategies for planning and budgeting.

Why “free” public schooling isn’t cost-free

Public schools are publicly funded through property taxes, state funds and federal support, yet many school districts pass on ancillary expenses to families. According to one recent review, families should expect to budget for a range of items beyond attendance alone.
In practice, these “hidden costs” can include technology fees, activity charges, supplies, uniforms, graduation extras and more.
Understanding that the term “tuition-free” does not mean “cost-free” is the first step for parents and students aiming to plan effectively.

Major categories of hidden costs

School supplies and technology

• Basic items: pencils, notebooks, folders, backpacks.

• Subject-specific materials: calculators, lab kits, art supplies.

• Technology: tablets or laptops in one-to-one districts, insurance or usage fees.

• Price pressures: In 2025, supplies are up ~7.3 % from last year, outpacing overall inflation. For